Feigned outrage
I’ll apologize up front for the overuse of quotation marks as indicators of sarcasm. That said, it has been disappointing to watch the level of “outrage” amongst “conservatives” these past few months on any number of “issues,” most recent of which is a back-to-school speech by President Obama that will be broadcast Tuesday across the country.
Our own local paper reported that school officials will provide alternate activities for students whose parents don’t want them watching Obama’s speech. Which is fine, so far as it goes — one wonders why schools don’t make it so easy for parents who don’t want their children immunized, for instance, or subjected to all manner of “tolerance” seminars — but what possible reason would one have for not wanting their child to see it? The same talking heads who are denouncing the speech are the ones who claim superiority on most issues of “patriotism”; since the presidency is set up by the Constitution, it would seem they’d at least let the guy tell their kids to do their homework and not play so many video games.
Some people, it seems, are so bent on finding anything wrong with Obama that, in turn, they’re forced to find everything wrong. The whole thing reminds me of one of the wiser comments I heard during the Sotomayor hearings a couple months back (it may have been Larison who said it, but I don’t remember off the top of my head). In her now-infamous “wise Latina woman” comments, Sotomayor was roundly accused of being racist — a charge that Republicans have long claimed was being leveled against them all too often, unfairly and generally with no regard to the context of what they were saying. Yet, instead of prove their point by holding their tongues, they simply decided that what was good for the goose was good for them, and hence lowered even further the amount of dialogue allowed where issues of culture/heritage/class are considered.
The equation seems to be this: Liberalism is socialism (it’s not). Obama is liberal (well, on some things). So Obama is a socialist. And since socialists like Hitler and Kim Jong Il sometimes speak to their people, the fact that Obama wants to give a speech shows just how socialist he is.
Tags: cranked to 11, Kim Jong Obama
This entry was posted on Saturday, September 5th, 2009 at 3.26 pm and is filed under politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

September 5th, 2009 at 6.54 pm
Some good points. Even though I “tow the party line” lol. I agree that schools don’t accommodate other convictions. I think people forget that Reagan gave an address to school kids. I guess it was a different time. People (conservatives)do feel that this administration has an agenda. The only problem I have at this point stems from the “I Pledge” video that was shown in some school settings. It was bad taste and showed some slant “I pledge to advance stem cell research”. A mere stay in school speech doesn’t bother me though!
September 9th, 2009 at 7.02 pm
By all accounts, the fringe-right response to a pending speech was much adieu about nothing. (Post on health care speech pending.)
September 10th, 2009 at 1.12 pm
America is ripe for a civil split! Of the One shall there be Two. Just think how great it would be. Everyone would get to go to the country where everyone else interprets the constitution as they do, and be happy forever. Then they could have wars and kill each other, like they already do with their words and in their thoughts. I think it’s for the best.
September 10th, 2009 at 7.39 pm
Derek – Someone once wrote a song, “God Blessed Texas”. They have an idea similar to yours; Secession.